A new analysis published in March 2026 makes an argument that should be obvious but, in the United States, remains controversial: opera and ballet cannot survive on private funding alone. Celebrity advocacy, viral moments, and social media campaigns may generate attention, but they do not generate the sustained institutional funding that keeps companies solvent and tickets affordable.
The American Model Is Failing
The evidence is not ambiguous. Between 2005 and 2023, box office receipts and private donations for American performing arts companies declined in real terms, even as administrative expenses grew. The gap has widened every year since.
The Metropolitan Opera — America's largest and most prestigious opera company — has begun draining its endowment to cover operating losses. It has announced layoffs. Reports have circulated that the company has considered selling its iconic Marc Chagall murals, the twin paintings that define the facade of Lincoln Center, to stay solvent.
This is the Metropolitan Opera. If the Met cannot make the American funding model work, no opera company can.
The European Comparison
The contrast with Europe is not subtle.
In Germany, opera companies are publicly owned institutions. The Berlin State Ballet, the Bavarian State Opera, and dozens of regional houses across the country receive government funding that covers the majority of their operating costs. This is not charity. It is policy — a deliberate decision that the performing arts are part of civic infrastructure.
In France, opera companies receive more than twice as much of their income from government funding as from ticket sales. The Paris Opera sells tickets for as little as €10, with heavily discounted prices for young people, the elderly, and the unemployed. This is what public funding makes possible: not just institutional survival, but genuine public access.
The United States has nothing comparable. The NEA — which has faced renewed elimination efforts during the second Trump presidency — distributed approximately $170 million annually to arts organisations across the entire country. The city of Berlin alone spends more than that on its cultural institutions.
The Accessibility Question
The fundamental question is not whether opera and ballet are "worth" funding. It is whether they will exist as art forms accessible to ordinary people, or only as luxury experiences for the wealthy.
Without public funding, ticket prices must rise to cover costs. When ticket prices rise, audiences narrow. When audiences narrow, companies programme more conservatively to retain their remaining patrons. When programming narrows, the art form stagnates.
This is not a hypothetical sequence. It is a description of what has happened in the United States over the past forty years.
The Celebrity Fallacy
The analysis is particularly sharp on the limits of celebrity advocacy. When a famous actor attends the ballet or a pop star posts about opera, the resulting attention is real but temporary. It does not translate into sustained ticket purchases, recurring donations, or political support for public arts funding.
Culture, the analysis argues, "isn't about intrinsic appeal alone — it requires institutions that make art accessible to ordinary people." Those institutions require money. And the only funding source large enough, stable enough, and democratically accountable enough to provide it is government.
The Choice
The performing arts in America are not dying because audiences don't care. They are dying because the country has made a political choice — reinforced over decades and across administrations — that public funding for the arts is optional.
Every other wealthy democracy has made the opposite choice. The results are visible: affordable tickets, stable institutions, diverse programming, and art forms that belong to the public rather than to the donors who can afford to sustain them.
The United States can continue on its current path. The Met will sell its Chagalls. Regional opera companies will close. Ticket prices will rise. And the performing arts will become, definitively, a privilege rather than a public good.
Or the country can change course. The policy mechanisms are well understood. The international models are proven. The only missing ingredient is political will.
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.