One thing the dismissals of Andris Nelsons in Boston and Markus Hinterhäuser in Salzburg have in common is that neither man deserved it.
The Record Speaks
Nelsons had been an exemplary music director of the Boston Symphony Orchestra for twelve years. He inspired respect and affection from musicians and audiences in roughly equal measure. No credible artistic cause has been given for his removal.
Hinterhäuser led the Salzburg Festival through a decade of geopolitical turbulence — wars, sanctions, collapsed sponsorships — and emerged with the festival's artistic credibility not merely intact but enhanced. His programming drew comparisons to Salzburg's golden era. That is not a small achievement.
Both men will find work. The question is what happens to the institutions they leave behind.
Who Are These Boards?
The governing bodies that ordered these dismissals share a profile. They are composed of wealthy individuals whose connection to the art form is philanthropic rather than professional. They attend galas. They sit in boxes. They occasionally commission programme notes. What they do not do — with honourable exceptions — is understand the daily reality of running an artistic institution.
This has always been the case. What has changed is the confidence with which these boards now act. The current geopolitical climate, in which strongman governance is fashionable and consequences are for other people, appears to have emboldened institutional leaders who previously would have hesitated before removing a respected artistic director.
The Damage
Boston and Salzburg are now damaged vehicles. The BSO must find a music director willing to work under a board that has demonstrated it will terminate a successful tenure without public explanation. Salzburg must find an artistic director willing to accept a role from which their predecessor was expelled mid-contract.
These are not attractive propositions for first-rank candidates.
The Lesson
Classical music institutions are fragile. They depend on trust — between artists and administrators, between performers and audiences, between the people who make the art and the people who fund it.
When boards break that trust, the consequences are not immediate. Orchestras continue to play. Festivals continue to sell tickets. But something corrodes. The best conductors, the best administrators, the best artists begin to look elsewhere — to institutions where their work is valued and their tenure is not subject to the whims of people who confuse authority with competence.
The saddest thing about Boston and Salzburg is that none of this was necessary.
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.